And that's really the workflow of building a Drupal site. After they pour content into it, and as they create the content, it just fills in the list over here, the list over there, a sidebar here, and this page here and so forth.
#BITNAMI MEAN ANGULAR 2 CODE#
Then, we model that in Drupal by maybe building a little custom code for it, and putting a theme on it. After, we'll go through and do the content strategy by looking at their needs and what they want to do and what their design direction is.
#BITNAMI MEAN ANGULAR 2 HOW TO#
They hire us and say 'Here's our 100,000-page site, here's the kinda stuff we need, and figure out how to model that in Drupal'. Usually, at my company, ., a Drupal consulting firm, we are the site builders. I would say for most of my clients those are different people. On some sites, those can be the same people, which is totally fine if it is small. Site builders should be able to build the business logic, hand it off to a content editor who can then just edit content, select things in the UI and not have to worry about all of the business logic that was built for them by the site builder. And then, they can have a list of faculty content matching that matches their rules in this format. So, the site builder sets up a site and creates structure of these content types and the fields they're gonna have. They build the business rules around what the structure of that content is and where to display it. They need to understand Drupal buzzwords like node, entity, views, node cue, view modes, and things like that. Then there's we call a site builder, who needs to understand Drupal. They should be able to understand 'I have content and it breaks down this way', and 'I'm going to create this collection of content and display it'. They should understand content such as creating an event instead of an event page, and they should not have to understand what PHP is. One is the content editor who should be able to enter content easily without having to be very tech-savvy. This is something of an open discussion within Drupal of who is Drupal for and who is the target audience, and I would say there's a couple of different important audiences.
Larry Garfield: I would say there's two different roles. That’s something where we feel Drupal is, if not unique, then certainly one of the leaders in that area of 'I want to build something powerful but I don't wanna write code to do so'. There's still a lot of customization you can do with code to Drupal, but we try and put a lot of emphasis into the site builder experience for the person who's going to sit down and push buttons to architect a web site. That's really Drupal's mission statements, where people should be able to build content-rich, content-driven sites without having to write code or with writing as little code as possible. With Drupal, you can do all of that by pushing buttons rather than writing code. For example, a news article, and on this page is a list of news articles and on this page is a list of news articles in a sidebar beside something else. This could mean on a web site or on a mobile app, but it could also simply mean 'I want to be able to push a couple of buttons and say here is'. If you have three dozen pages that need to be edited and want to have a common header on them, Drupal will do that and do it well, but it is somewhat overkill.ĭrupal is really good once you start thinking in terms of 'I have information and content I want to expose', and 'I want to be able to expose it in different ways'.
#BITNAMI MEAN ANGULAR 2 MANUAL#
In terms of a focus, I would say upper mid-range type of sites provide enough content that doesn’t allow for manual editing. There are a lot of newspapers on Drupal that have been using it for a long time.
Drupal is very successful, and some of its most successful markets are government and education. Larry Garfield: Drupal, the community, is large enough that there's someone targeting every possible sector.
0 kommentar(er)
